<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fireworks &#038; Lighten Blend Mode</title>
	<link>http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com/blog/2007/07/05/fireworks-lighten-blend-mode/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: roscoe</title>
		<link>http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com/blog/2007/07/05/fireworks-lighten-blend-mode/#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>roscoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com/blog/2007/07/05/fireworks-lighten-blend-mode/#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>Mr. Chapman, I can appreciate the utility of this technique in astrophotography.  However, I'm less willing to accept it as a way to present everyday images (ie, the fireworks example) as I feel it runs the risk of transforming such appealing, spontaneous, lifelike moments into mechanically enhanced facsimiles.  Which in turn raises the attendant question of how much post-processing constitutes _too_ much?

Regards,

Roscoe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Chapman, I can appreciate the utility of this technique in astrophotography.  However, I&#8217;m less willing to accept it as a way to present everyday images (ie, the fireworks example) as I feel it runs the risk of transforming such appealing, spontaneous, lifelike moments into mechanically enhanced facsimiles.  Which in turn raises the attendant question of how much post-processing constitutes _too_ much?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Roscoe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
